Reflections on the relationships between painting and music finally convinced Kandinsky that painting should increasingly resemble music and that colors should increasingly assimilate to sounds. Music, in fact, is pure expression of inner needs and does not imitate nature: therefore it is in itself abstract.
Painting too, according to Kandinsky, must be abstract, abandoning the imitation of a model. Only an abstract painting, that is non-figurative, where forms have no connection with anything recognizable, freed from dependence on the physical object, can give life to spirituality.
Kandinsky recounts that slowly he developed a sort of ability not to notice the object in the painting, to let it escape him.
Much later, in Munich, one day I was struck by an unexpected spectacle, just as I was returning to my studio. The sun was setting; I was returning after drawing and was still completely absorbed in my work when, opening the studio door, I saw before me an indescribably beautiful picture.
At first I was astonished, but then I approached that enigmatic painting, absolutely incomprehensible in its content and made exclusively of patches of color. Finally I understood: it was a painting that I had painted and that had been placed upside down on the easel.
The next day I tried, in the sunlight, to revive the same impression, but I did not succeed. Although the painting was still upside down, I could distinguish the objects and that subtle light of the sunset was missing. That day, however, it became perfectly clear to me that the object had no place, indeed it was harmful to my paintings.
From now on it will become increasingly difficult to identify known forms in Kandinsky’s paintings, while the combinations of colors will take on greater and greater importance, composing themselves in such a way as to give rise to a true feast for the eyes.